Actions for Dialogue Survey

Name of the organization (or private person):

Country:

Did you receive a micro-grant from the Foundation?:

Yes

Model

What do you consider the most successful aspect of the campaign?:

Establishing of contact between the Foundation and your organisation

Giving visibility to the dialogue work your organisation is doing

Organisation of Dialogue Night Event

Involvement of a high number of people in dialogue activities

Other: Please specify below

Other:

Was it a good idea to concentrate actions within the month of May?:

Yes

Please give reasons for your answer:

Do you think an annual week of dialogue is a positive idea?:

Yes

At the Euro-Med Ministerial on intercultural dialogue (Athens, 29 to 30 May 2008), Ministers of Culture decided to ‘explore the possibility of a declaration on an annual week of intercultural dialogue’.

If no, please explain and suggest an alternative model.:

It should be a longer period, please specify

It should be a shorter period, please specify

What would be the best period during which to organise Dialogue Week or future editions of the campaign?:

It should remain the month of May

It should be another month, please specify

Other, please specify below

Please specify the type of activities that could be organised during this week?:

Other:

For future editions of the campaign, should the theme of the actions be open?:

Yes

If no, which themes would you choose to concentrate on?:

Was the model effective in engaging the general public and people who are not usually involved in dialogue initiatives ?:

Yes

If no, please explain why and how you think the outreach could be improved?:

Mobilisation

Were you satisfied with the direct contact established with the focal points at the Foundation's headquarters?:

Yes

Please explain your answer:

How can the best coordination at the local and national level be ensured?:

Full coordination by the Head of Network at the national level

Nomination of focal point from the Foundation per country

Nomination of focal point per sector of activity

Nomination of a campaign pilot group within the country

Nomination of a coordinating body per geographical area

Other: please specify below

Could you please explain the suggested model?:

Were you able to create new partnerships through the process?:

Yes

If yes, please specify which types of partnerships?:

For future editions, what type of partnerships should be emphasised?:

Other:

Based on your answer above, what would be the best way to approach and involve such organisations?:

In your opinion, has the campaign had an impact on the development and cohesion of the network in your country?:

Yes

Please elaborate:

Supporting Action

Was the online application process for the micro-grants successful/effective?:

Yes

If no, please give reasons:

What financial support scheme would you suggest for future common events?:

No financial support for actions

Grants to individual organisations implementing actions

Grants for consortia of organisations

Co-organisation of activities with partners, heads of network and members

Support to mobilise other sponsors

In what other ways could the ALF support members and actions in future editions of collective action?:

Help in the search for partners

Give advice related to the implementation of actions

Provide contact with the media

Give visibility for actions

Help in securing funds

Other: please explain below

Other:

How can other funds (besides funds directly provided by the ALF headquarters) be mobilised and raised for future editions?:

Visibility

What are the main messages the Foundation should communicate in the future for a collective operation?:

Did the campaign lead to an increase in visibility for the Anna Lindh Foundation and its national networks?:

Yes

If yes, in which way and with whom?:

If no, what more should have been done?:

How effective were the communication and promotional tools developed for the campaign?

Website platform:

Very effective

Not very effective

Effective

Printed Promotional Material:

Very effective

Not very effective

Effective

Do you have recommendations for communication and promotional tools to be used in future campaigns?:

Did you find the campaign effective in engaging the press and media?:

Yes

If yes, what aspects of the campaign attracted the media the most?:

How could the involvement of press, media and communication partners be improved in the future?:

Follow-up

What are you planning as a follow-up to your dialogue initiative?:

Repeating the activity next year

Developing a long term project on the basis of the first initiative

Organising a training session to share your experience

Publishing the outcomes of the activity

Other: please specify below

Please explain your choice:

What would you recommend the ALF should do to support the sustainability of the campaign/dialogue initiatives?:

Organise training session to present best practices and the campaign model

Maintain individual contacts with organisations to support sustainability

Disseminate the outputs

Further develop communication tools

Other: please specify below

Please provide details and/or suggestions:

If you have taken part in the "Euro-Mediterranean Youth Forum" in Turin and/or "A Sea of Words" regional initiative(s):

What is your overall assessment of the initiatives?:

I didn't take part

Positive

Negative

Please explain:

What are your suggestion for future development of this kind of activities?:

Actions for Dialogue Survey

Model

Mobilisation

Supporting Action

Visibility

Follow-up

Thank you very much for your support and constructive comments,
The campaign team

Quick Links

Facebook

Actions for Dialogue Survey

Model

Mobilisation

Supporting Action

Visibility

Follow-up

Thank you very much for your support and constructive comments, The campaign team

Quick Links

Facebook

Thank you very much for your support and constructive comments,
The campaign team